|
Post by showmum on May 27, 2009 19:02:45 GMT
does anyone no who won the novice show hunter and 13hd sh, also small intermediates, thanks
|
|
avrose
Junior Member
Colbeach Mark of Respect
Posts: 82
|
Post by avrose on May 27, 2009 20:41:55 GMT
Any hack results?
|
|
|
Post by Caroline on May 27, 2009 21:11:15 GMT
lge hack and champ was charles and pickpocket - 2nd (also winner of novice and qual) dark bay (think it was same horse ridden by david bartram last wk at area 10? ) -only 4 in large class. small class - only one forward - but unfortunately this was unsound and left the ring, so champion and res from large class.
|
|
apples
Junior Member
Posts: 179
|
Post by apples on Jun 2, 2009 10:14:22 GMT
what about m &m lrg breeds in hand results?
|
|
|
Post by bsprimadonna on Jun 9, 2009 11:49:50 GMT
Beseeka Prima Donna, took the Novice and 2nd in the open + res Champ.... thats my little princess..... oooooh we're off to RIHS!
|
|
|
Post by guest 3666 on Jun 17, 2009 20:45:36 GMT
i completely disagree with the comments made about the judging at warrington show. the gorgeous youngster deserved to win the classes and was placed accordingly. my main argument is with the accusation that the judging was poor, from my point of view it was a very well judged class, that unlike many classes that i have seen over the past years, the judges did not feel obliged to place the well named horses in the rosettes. It seems that many classes are judged purely on the name of the rider, rather then the horse. The judges also took a view on the weight of the horse which is a ever growing problem in the native/traditional classes, big is not better! why should a horse that wrong legs it be placed above a horse that went sweet? CHAPS don't need to look into the judges that do not buckle under the big names, but they need to be checking judges that consistently seem to judge the riders name rather then the horse, on the other hand to all those who won at warrington congratulations on doing so, they were truly well deserved places.
|
|
|
Post by guest 3556 on Jun 17, 2009 20:50:30 GMT
Just wondering people thoughts on coloured youngstock judging? And more importantly why on EARTH they didn't split the class no youngster should have to be in the ring that long. Thought they all coped very well - maybe it was the sunshine i agree that it was a big class, however compared to the size of some ridden classes it was nothing, and it brings up the argument that should youngsters be competing if they can not cope with large classes, on the other hand the sun was shining and everything went smoothly
|
|
|
Post by guest 1987 on Jun 17, 2009 21:45:02 GMT
i completely disagree with the comments made about the judging at warrington show. the gorgeous youngster deserved to win the classes and was placed accordingly. my main argument is with the accusation that the judging was poor, from my point of view it was a very well judged class, that unlike many classes that i have seen over the past years, the judges did not feel obliged to place the well named horses in the rosettes. It seems that many classes are judged purely on the name of the rider, rather then the horse. The judges also took a view on the weight of the horse which is a ever growing problem in the native/traditional classes, big is not better! why should a horse that wrong legs it be placed above a horse that went sweet? CHAPS don't need to look into the judges that do not buckle under the big names, but they need to be checking judges that consistently seem to judge the riders name rather then the horse, on the other hand to all those who won at warrington congratulations on doing so, they were truly well deserved places. i so agree wit those comments guest 3336 ur points are good. it was fairly judged and the winners were nicely bred horses especialy the youngersty ;D
|
|
|
Post by guest123 on Jun 17, 2009 23:16:39 GMT
well i think the judgeing of the ridden classes was a disgrace there were ponies who were at the top of the line who went on the wrong leg three times some of them. the judge didnt even know we had to do a go round! so i think chaps really do need to make sure there judges no what there doing!
|
|
|
Post by guest 1887 on Jun 18, 2009 18:19:38 GMT
from my point of view it was not the judge that didn't know what they were doing but the steward, and clearly riders need to remember that just because they thank the judge everytime they go past doesn't mean they should get a higher place, everybody has bad days and maybe the horse was not what the judge liked, it has happened to me before, and if it had been a hoys qualifier i could understand your frustration however it was not. judges may make mistakes from time to time and should not have to worry that that mistake will be spread across the Internet by some riders that just through a hissy fit when they don't get their own way. Do you really think the judge would of passed her assessment if she didn't know how a show was conducted, unless it ran like most of the CHAPS classes and she paid her assessor.
|
|
|
Post by lils on Jul 3, 2009 21:31:01 GMT
id like to say thank you for the positive comments about my youngster, Hopgarden Hanky Panky winning the youngstock,
|
|