|
Post by tanina on Nov 5, 2008 12:18:42 GMT
I think there must be some confusion between Jill rushton - snoopydog & myself Tanina Rushton. Tanina
We are two totally different people, different addresses, (we love in different counties) different computers etc, the only thing we have in common is Jill has taken on one of my dartmoors to break & sell.
We are not the same family! But both our husbands happen to be rushtons but are NOT related to each other!
Jill placed an advert, & admittedly made the mistake of saying she had PM someone, a genuine mistake which one of your mods altered as per your rules - fair enough.
I then made a posting which you edited & added to Jills !!!!
Jill has now returned the pony to me for a winter break, I added a posting to the topic saying so. I couldn't add it to Jills I'm a different person !!! & I don't think its right that I should edit some one else posting any way.
Now the whole posting has been removed! Could you tellme why!
Many thanks
Tanina
|
|
|
Post by leo on Nov 5, 2008 14:18:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Guestless on Nov 5, 2008 18:56:59 GMT
The thread automatically goes to where it should be, in this case I think it's on page 3. I know you can't edit the original advert, but I still feel it is unfair for the advert to be bumped when the information can be included in the original advert as it is now. It was brought to my attention by PM, so at least one member obviously agrees.
Feel free to bump it next Tuesday once 14 days have past.
|
|
|
Post by tanina on Nov 5, 2008 19:09:53 GMT
I don't want to bump it! I just couldn't find it! & I feel like a schoolgirl that been ticked (or crossed) off in red, for something beyond my control! How else was I to add up to date info on the circumstances & contact info of the pony?
I thought it was because you thought we were from the same family! deliberatly bumping it up?
Jill is no longer involved, (no we havn't fallen out LOL) so I suppose the alternative was to delete & re-enter, but didn't think this necessary? I suppose this is the exception that proves the rule?
Thanks anyway
Tanina
|
|